V.Ramakrishnan vs Sithanandam — 392/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OrderVIIRule1. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 30th July 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCD100007632024
Filing Number
785/2024
Filing Date
05-Nov-2024
Registration No
392/2024
Registration Date
05-Nov-2024
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Chidambaram
Judge
4-Additional District Munsif
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.V.Ramakrishnan
Adv. K. Sathiyamoorthy
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sithanandam
Case History
-
30-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Jun-2026
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
02-Jun-2026
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
22-Apr-2026
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
17-Apr-2026
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
24-Mar-2026
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
18-Mar-2026
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
12-Mar-2026
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
07-Mar-2026
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
17-Feb-2026
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Feb-2026
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
05-Feb-2026
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
22-Jan-2026
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
17-Dec-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
06-Dec-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
21-Nov-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
28-Oct-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
07-Oct-2025
Orders
Additional District Munsif
-
17-Sep-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
12-Sep-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
11-Sep-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
03-Sep-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
13-Aug-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
06-Aug-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
25-Jul-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
24-Jul-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
21-Jul-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
16-Jul-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
30-Jun-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: OS 392/2024 - V. Ramakrishnan v. P. Sithandhan The Additional District Munsif, Chidambaram allowed petitioner V. Ramakrishnan's petition filed under Order 7 Rule 14(3) CPC to receive patta documents (land ownership records) by condoning the delay in filing them. The documents relate to agricultural land in Melasokanathanpettai village involving a family oral partition. The court allowed the petition to enable complete adjudication and substantial justice, while reserving questions on the documents' admissibility, proof, and relevancy for the main suit. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Jun-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
27-Jun-2025
Orders
Additional District Munsif
-
26-Jun-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Jun-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
21-Apr-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
12-Mar-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
04-Mar-2025
Orders
Additional District Munsif
-
25-Feb-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
18-Feb-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
04-Feb-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
01-Feb-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
30-Jan-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
28-Jan-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
23-Jan-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
04-Dec-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
05-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 392/2024
Case Summary: OS 392/2024 - V. Ramakrishnan v. P. Sithandhan The Additional District Munsif, Chidambaram allowed petitioner V. Ramakrishnan's petition filed under Order 7 Rule 14(3) CPC to receive patta documents (land ownership records) by condoning the delay in filing them. The documents relate to agricultural land in Melasokanathanpettai village involving a family oral partition. The court allowed the petition to enable complete adjudication and substantial justice, while reserving questions on the documents' admissibility, proof, and relevancy for the main suit. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts