Govinthsamy vs MangalaLekshmi — 126/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OrderVIIRule1. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCD100003572024
Filing Number
363/2024
Filing Date
23-Apr-2024
Registration No
126/2024
Registration Date
23-Apr-2024
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Chidambaram
Judge
4-Additional District Munsif
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Govinthsamy
Adv. T.Amuthan
Respondent(s)
-
1.MangalaLekshmi
-
2.Banumathi
-
3.Sathish
-
4.Alakeshwari
-
5.Thiruppati
-
6.Tahsildar
Case History
-
17-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Jun-2026
Trial
Additional District Munsif
-
07-Apr-2026
Trial
Additional District Munsif
-
27-Mar-2026
Trial
Additional District Munsif
-
24-Mar-2026
Trial
Additional District Munsif
-
12-Mar-2026
Trial
Additional District Munsif
-
10-Mar-2026
Additional Issues
Additional District Munsif
-
06-Mar-2026
Additional Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
07-Jan-2026
Additional Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
11-Dec-2025
Additional Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
28-Nov-2025
Additional Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
20-Nov-2025
Amendment
Additional District Munsif
-
14-Nov-2025
Amendment
Additional District Munsif
-
05-Nov-2025
Copy of Order
Case Summary: 126/2024 Court: Additional District Civil Court, Chidambaram Date: November 5, 2025 Petition 181/2025 by petitioner Govinthsamy (plaintiff in original case 126/2024) against respondents MangalaLekshmi, Banumathi, Sathish, Amudheswari, Tirupathi, and the Tahsildar of Buvanagiri sought to amend the plaint by correcting the third respondent's name from "Sathish" to "Sathish Kumar." The court allowed the petition, finding the correction justified based on a memo provided and that no prejudice would result to the respondents. The petition was admitted without conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Nov-2025
Amendment
Additional District Munsif
-
04-Nov-2025
Orders
Additional District Munsif
-
30-Oct-2025
Orders
Additional District Munsif
-
15-Oct-2025
Orders
Additional District Munsif
-
14-Oct-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Oct-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
11-Sep-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
28-Aug-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
07-Aug-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
28-Jul-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
22-Jul-2025
Appearance
Additional District Munsif
-
30-Jun-2025
Appearance
Additional District Munsif
-
23-Jun-2025
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Jun-2025
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
17-Apr-2025
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
24-Mar-2025
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
04-Mar-2025
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
25-Feb-2025
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
30-Jan-2025
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
19-Dec-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
10-Dec-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
07-Nov-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
14-Oct-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
02-Sep-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
01-Aug-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
03-Jul-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
07-Jun-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
23-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 126/2024
Case Summary: 126/2024 Court: Additional District Civil Court, Chidambaram Date: November 5, 2025 Petition 181/2025 by petitioner Govinthsamy (plaintiff in original case 126/2024) against respondents MangalaLekshmi, Banumathi, Sathish, Amudheswari, Tirupathi, and the Tahsildar of Buvanagiri sought to amend the plaint by correcting the third respondent's name from "Sathish" to "Sathish Kumar." The court allowed the petition, finding the correction justified based on a memo provided and that no prejudice would result to the respondents. The petition was admitted without conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts