MUTHANDIKUPPAM PS vs Thangarasu — 337/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 448,427,294(b),323,324,506(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 08-Jul-2026

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNCD090060292024

e-Filing Number

27-08-2024

Filing Number

6025/2024

Filing Date

12-Nov-2024

Registration No

337/2024

Registration Date

12-Nov-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Panruti

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate No.I

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

337

Police Station

Thookkanambakkam P.S.

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 448,427,294(b),323,324,506(2)
Tn Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 Section 4
Mp/1/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section SHOMuthandikuppamPSVengadesan
Mp/2/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section SHOMuthandikuppamPSThangarasu
Mp/3/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section VengadesanMuthandikuppam PS
Mp/4/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section MUTHANDIKUPPAM PSThangarasu

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUTHANDIKUPPAM PS (Police Station)

    Adv. SI Of Police Sho Muthandikuppam PS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Thangarasu

Case History

  1. 08-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  3. 19-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 337/2024 (Muthandhikuppam PS v. Thangarasu) Case Status: Witness deposition recorded; case adjourned for continuation of cross-examination. This is a criminal case involving assault allegations. A 52-year-old female witness (LW2/PW1) deposed before the Judicial Magistrate at Panruti on 07.04.2026, describing an alleged incident from 2022 where four accused persons allegedly assaulted her son, damaged property, and stole items from her home. The witness detailed the alleged attackers' actions, including beatings and vehicle damage. During cross-examination, the accused challenged the witness's credibility regarding details of the incident, injuries sustained, and medical treatment. The court noted that documentary evidence (including vehicle valuation certificates and medical records) may be produced in subsequent hearings. The case has been adjourned to allow completion of cross-examination and submission of additional evidence by both prosecution and defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  8. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  9. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  10. 11-Aug-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  11. 22-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  12. 08-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  13. 17-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  14. 13-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  15. 22-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  16. 21-Apr-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  17. 07-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  18. 03-Jan-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  19. 12-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 12-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 337/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 337/2024 (Muthandhikuppam PS v. Thangarasu) Case Status: Witness deposition recorded; case adjourned for continuation of cross-examination. This is a criminal case involving assault allegations. A 52-year-old female witness (LW2/PW1) deposed before the Judicial Magistrate at Panruti on 07.04.2026, describing an alleged incident from 2022 where four accused persons allegedly assaulted her son, damaged property, and stole items from her home. The witness detailed the alleged attackers' actions, including beatings and vehicle damage. During cross-examination, the accused challenged the witness's credibility regarding details of the incident, injuries sustained, and medical treatment. The court noted that documentary evidence (including vehicle valuation certificates and medical records) may be produced in subsequent hearings. The case has been adjourned to allow completion of cross-examination and submission of additional evidence by both prosecution and defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case