Rajalakshmi vs T.S.Prabu — 424/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 02-Jul-2026 this date has passed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNCD090005652022

Filing Number

559/2022

Filing Date

15-Jul-2022

Registration No

424/2022

Registration Date

15-Jul-2022

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Panruti

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate No.I

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajalakshmi

    Adv. P.Baskar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.T.S.Prabu

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  4. 01-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  5. 12-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  6. 07-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  7. 15-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  9. 18-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  10. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  11. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  12. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  13. 22-Jan-2026

    Copy of Deposition

    Case 424/2022 Summary In STC No. 424/2022 before the Judicial Magistrate Court at Panruti, witness PW1 (Rajalakshmi, age 40) testified on 22.01.2026 regarding financial transactions and a property sale documented through six exhibits. During cross-examination, the witness clarified that income received through various transactions was used for personal expenses and to extend loans to the opposing party, and that a property sale proceeded in the manner documented. The court recorded the witness's deposition and admitted the documentary evidence into the record. The proceedings concluded with the witness's examination complete. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  15. 12-Dec-2025

    Cmp Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  16. 21-Nov-2025

    Cmp Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  17. 07-Nov-2025

    Cmp Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  18. 24-Oct-2025

    Cmp Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  19. 19-Sep-2025

    Cmp Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  20. 04-Sep-2025

    Cmp Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  21. 21-Aug-2025

    Cmp Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  22. 08-Aug-2025

    Cmp Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  23. 25-Jul-2025

    Cmp Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  24. 10-Jul-2025

    Cmp Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  25. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  26. 23-May-2025

    Copy of Deposition

  27. 23-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  28. 08-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  29. 09-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  30. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  31. 18-Feb-2025

    Copy of Deposition

  32. 18-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  33. 28-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  34. 24-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  35. 03-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  36. 27-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  37. 29-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  38. 19-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  39. 17-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  40. 03-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  41. 20-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  42. 06-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  43. 09-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  44. 10-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  45. 15-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  46. 17-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  47. 27-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  48. 22-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  49. 31-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  50. 10-Jan-2024

    Copy of Deposition

  51. 10-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  52. 06-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  53. 22-Nov-2023

    Copy of Deposition

  54. 22-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  55. 01-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  56. 26-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  57. 14-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  58. 22-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  59. 20-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  60. 21-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  61. 17-May-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  62. 12-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  63. 08-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  64. 08-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  65. 04-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  66. 09-Dec-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  67. 23-Nov-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  68. 19-Oct-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  69. 26-Sep-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  70. 22-Aug-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  71. 15-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  72. 15-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 424/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case 424/2022 Summary In STC No. 424/2022 before the Judicial Magistrate Court at Panruti, witness PW1 (Rajalakshmi, age 40) testified on 22.01.2026 regarding financial transactions and a property sale documented through six exhibits. During cross-examination, the witness clarified that income received through various transactions was used for personal expenses and to extend loans to the opposing party, and that a property sale proceeded in the manner documented. The court recorded the witness's deposition and admitted the documentary evidence into the record. The proceedings concluded with the witness's examination complete. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case