Sivabalan vs MD, Tamilnadu state transport corporation limited. — 47/2021

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166(1). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNCD070003012021

Filing Number

309/2021

Filing Date

25-Feb-2021

Registration No

47/2021

Registration Date

01-Mar-2021

Court

Sub Court, Panruti

Judge

1-Sub Judge

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sivabalan

    Adv. M.Sivamani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MD, Tamilnadu state transport corporation limited.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Sub Judge

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Sub Judge

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Reopen

    Sub Judge

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Sub Judge

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Sub Judge

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Sub Judge

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Sub Judge

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Sub Judge

  10. 10-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Sub Judge

  11. 09-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Sub Judge

  12. 02-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Sub Judge

  13. 27-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  14. 09-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  15. 05-Dec-2025

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  16. 21-Nov-2025

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  17. 12-Sep-2025

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  18. 20-Aug-2025

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  19. 25-Jun-2025

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  20. 23-Apr-2025

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  21. 12-Mar-2025

    Copy of Deposition

    In MCOP 47/2021, the Sub Judge at Panruti examined witness testimony regarding a bus accident involving petitioner Sivabalan, a permanent driver with Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation. The court recorded the witness's cross-examination statements acknowledging FIR registration, police custody, and departmental action taken against the petitioner following an accident investigation report. The court found no basis in the FIR or chargesheet to support the petitioner's claim that he wasn't wearing a seatbelt, and rejected his assertion that his speeding and negligence caused the accident, instead noting vehicle damage to the bumper, indicator, and body sheet consistent with the incident circumstances. No cross-examination was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  22. 12-Mar-2025

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  23. 05-Mar-2025

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  24. 05-Feb-2025

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  25. 22-Jan-2025

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  26. 08-Jan-2025

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  27. 18-Dec-2024

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  28. 06-Nov-2024

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  29. 18-Oct-2024

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  30. 27-Sep-2024

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  31. 19-Aug-2024

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  32. 24-Jul-2024

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  33. 28-Jun-2024

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  34. 12-Apr-2024

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  35. 11-Mar-2024

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  36. 09-Feb-2024

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  37. 05-Jan-2024

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  38. 03-Nov-2023

    Copy of Deposition

  39. 03-Nov-2023

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  40. 13-Oct-2023

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  41. 29-Sep-2023

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  42. 25-Aug-2023

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  43. 06-Jul-2023

    Copy of Deposition

  44. 06-Jul-2023

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  45. 15-Jun-2023

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  46. 07-Jun-2023

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  47. 19-Apr-2023

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  48. 05-Apr-2023

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  49. 29-Mar-2023

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  50. 24-Mar-2023

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  51. 17-Mar-2023

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  52. 21-Dec-2022

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  53. 15-Dec-2022

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  54. 31-Oct-2022

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  55. 10-Aug-2022

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  56. 03-Aug-2022

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  57. 22-Jun-2022

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  58. 20-Apr-2022

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  59. 23-Mar-2022

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  60. 16-Mar-2022

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  61. 23-Feb-2022

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  62. 12-Jan-2022

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  63. 01-Dec-2021

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  64. 27-Oct-2021

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  65. 29-Sep-2021

    Counter

    Sub Judge

  66. 25-Aug-2021

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge

  67. 02-Aug-2021

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge

  68. 28-Jul-2021

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge

  69. 13-Jul-2021

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge

  70. 09-Jun-2021

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge

  71. 01-Apr-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  72. 25-Feb-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 47/2021

casestatus.in Summary

In MCOP 47/2021, the Sub Judge at Panruti examined witness testimony regarding a bus accident involving petitioner Sivabalan, a permanent driver with Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation. The court recorded the witness's cross-examination statements acknowledging FIR registration, police custody, and departmental action taken against the petitioner following an accident investigation report. The court found no basis in the FIR or chargesheet to support the petitioner's claim that he wasn't wearing a seatbelt, and rejected his assertion that his speeding and negligence caused the accident, instead noting vehicle damage to the bumper, indicator, and body sheet consistent with the incident circumstances. No cross-examination was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case