R.Venugopal vs A.Bakkuthin Ali Agamed,and another — 1002858/2017

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 24(3). Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

For further Proceedings Next hearing 02-Jul-2026

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNCD060019632017

Filing Number

1002858/2017

Filing Date

24-Jul-2017

Registration No

1002858/2017

Registration Date

14-Sep-2017

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Cuddalore

Judge

10-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 24(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R.Venugopal

    Adv. Raama rathakrishnan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A.Bakkuthin Ali Agamed,and another

  2. 2.The oriental insurance co.Ltd.,

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jun-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  3. 24-Jun-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 17-Jun-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 09-Jun-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 02-Jun-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 30-Apr-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 27-Apr-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 20-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 09-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 01-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 17-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 11-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 07-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 02-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 31-Oct-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 16-Oct-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 26-Sep-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  32. 15-Sep-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 28-Aug-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  34. 28-Jul-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  35. 10-Jun-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  36. 09-Apr-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  37. 07-Mar-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  38. 03-Feb-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  39. 10-Jan-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  40. 06-Dec-2024

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  41. 04-Nov-2024

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  42. 30-Sep-2024

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  43. 19-Aug-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This is a Motor Vehicles Act claim case (M.C.O.P. No. 2858/2017) heard on 19.08.2024 by Judge P. Nagarajan at the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Kadalur. Petitioner R. Venugopal testified as the first witness, describing a motor accident on 18.05.2017 where his two-wheeler was hit from behind by the respondent's vehicle while turning north on a four-lane road. Venugopal claimed simple injury, received 3 days of medical treatment, and resumed work after 15 days. The tribunal found no permanent disability or income loss. The case proceeded with cross-examination of the second respondent's side, and the matter was disposed with findings on liability and compensation based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  44. 19-Aug-2024

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  45. 16-Aug-2024

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  46. 22-Jul-2024

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  47. 06-Jul-2024

    Issue of Process

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  48. 20-Jun-2024

    Issue of Process

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  49. 10-Jun-2024

    Issue of Process

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  50. 09-May-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  51. 16-Apr-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  52. 04-Apr-2024

    Restored

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  53. 04-Apr-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  54. 04-Apr-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  55. 29-Aug-2018

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  56. 01-Aug-2018

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  57. 10-Jul-2018

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  58. 16-Apr-2018

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  59. 19-Feb-2018

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  60. 20-Dec-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  61. 24-Jul-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1002858/2017

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Motor Vehicles Act claim case (M.C.O.P. No. 2858/2017) heard on 19.08.2024 by Judge P. Nagarajan at the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Kadalur. Petitioner R. Venugopal testified as the first witness, describing a motor accident on 18.05.2017 where his two-wheeler was hit from behind by the respondent's vehicle while turning north on a four-lane road. Venugopal claimed simple injury, received 3 days of medical treatment, and resumed work after 15 days. The tribunal found no permanent disability or income loss. The case proceeded with cross-examination of the second respondent's side, and the matter was disposed with findings on liability and compensation based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case