KALAISELVI vs SHO CUDDALORE CCD II PS — 623/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503(1). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCD060012922026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

1114/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

623/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Cuddalore

Judge

13-Judicial Magistrate No.III

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KALAISELVI

    Adv. Manosundar S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer) CUDDALORE CCD II PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

    Case Summary: Kalaiselvi v. SHO Cuddalore Cyber Crime PS The court allowed the petitioner's petition to release Rs. 9,058/- that had been frozen by police in three bank accounts following an online fraud where Rs. 9,613/- was illegally stolen from her account. The court found the petitioner to be a fraud victim with a clear nexus between the frozen amount and her loss, and noted the police had no objections to the transfer. The petitioner was directed to execute a bond for Rs. 10,000/- and submit complete transaction details through the investigation officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No.III

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate No.III

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 623/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Kalaiselvi v. SHO Cuddalore Cyber Crime PS The court allowed the petitioner's petition to release Rs. 9,058/- that had been frozen by police in three bank accounts following an online fraud where Rs. 9,613/- was illegally stolen from her account. The court found the petitioner to be a fraud victim with a clear nexus between the frozen amount and her loss, and noted the police had no objections to the transfer. The petitioner was directed to execute a bond for Rs. 10,000/- and submit complete transaction details through the investigation officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case