SHO Bhuvanagiri P.S vs Ramesh — 66/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 430, 379,430, 379. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNCD010043892020
Filing Number
2382/2020
Filing Date
29-Oct-2020
Registration No
66/2020
Registration Date
29-Oct-2020
Court
Principal District Court, Cuddalore
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
182
Police Station
Bhuvanagiri P.S.
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHO (Station House Officer) Bhuvanagiri P.S
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ramesh
Case History
-
23-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: S.C.No. 66/2020 Petitioner: SHO Bhuvanagiri P.S Respondent: Ramesh Court: Primary Court, Kadalur District, Tamil Nadu Hearing Date: 25.09.2025 Summary: This case involves testimony from six government witnesses regarding the seizure of approximately 1/2 unit of smuggled river sand (gravel) from a vehicle on 23.07.2018. The witnesses—including police officers and bystanders—provided statements about the interception of the accused Ravesh near Kadalur, recovery of contraband sand, and the recording of confessional statements. During cross-examination, multiple witnesses retracted or qualified their earlier testimony, stating they were compelled to provide statements and could not verify details about the seizure. The court document records witness depositions but does not contain a final judgment or order on the case outcome as of the hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Aug-2025
Trial
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Aug-2025
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Jun-2025
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Mar-2025
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2025
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Dec-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Nov-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Sep-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Sep-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Sep-2024
Issue of Service
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Aug-2024
Issue of Service
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Jun-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Apr-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Mar-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Feb-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Dec-2023
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Nov-2023
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Oct-2023
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Sep-2023
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Aug-2023
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Jun-2023
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Apr-2023
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2023
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Feb-2023
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Dec-2022
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Nov-2022
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Sep-2022
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Jul-2022
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Jun-2022
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Apr-2022
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2022
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Jan-2022
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Dec-2021
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Nov-2021
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Sep-2021
Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Jul-2021
Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Jun-2021
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Apr-2021
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2021
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2021
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Jan-2021
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Dec-2020
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Oct-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Oct-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 66/2020
Case Summary: S.C.No. 66/2020 Petitioner: SHO Bhuvanagiri P.S Respondent: Ramesh Court: Primary Court, Kadalur District, Tamil Nadu Hearing Date: 25.09.2025 Summary: This case involves testimony from six government witnesses regarding the seizure of approximately 1/2 unit of smuggled river sand (gravel) from a vehicle on 23.07.2018. The witnesses—including police officers and bystanders—provided statements about the interception of the accused Ravesh near Kadalur, recovery of contraband sand, and the recording of confessional statements. During cross-examination, multiple witnesses retracted or qualified their earlier testimony, stating they were compelled to provide statements and could not verify details about the seizure. The court document records witness depositions but does not contain a final judgment or order on the case outcome as of the hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts