S.H.O. Aladi P.S. vs Neelakandan and another — 168/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,430. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNCD010041442022
Filing Number
2817/2022
Filing Date
26-Apr-2022
Registration No
168/2022
Registration Date
26-Apr-2022
Court
Principal District Court, Cuddalore
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
16
Police Station
Aladi P.S.
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S.H.O. Aladi P.S.
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Neelakandan and another
-
2.Bakkiaraj
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment
The court acquitted both accused under IPC Sections 379 and 430, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges of theft and criminal mischief related to water resources. The court also granted bail to the accused under Section 258(1) of BNSS, with directions for confiscation of seized minerals and deposit of case property after appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition
-
24-Mar-2026
Questioning
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition
-
05-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Jul-2025
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Jun-2025
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2025
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Jan-2025
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Nov-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Sep-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Aug-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Jun-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Apr-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Feb-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Dec-2023
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Nov-2023
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Oct-2023
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Aug-2023
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Jul-2023
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Jun-2023
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Apr-2023
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2023
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2023
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Dec-2022
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Nov-2022
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Sep-2022
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Jul-2022
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Apr-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 168/2022
The court acquitted both accused under IPC Sections 379 and 430, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges of theft and criminal mischief related to water resources. The court also granted bail to the accused under Section 258(1) of BNSS, with directions for confiscation of seized minerals and deposit of case property after appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts