Boovaragavamurthy vs SHO Srimuhnam PS — 1128/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCD010021412026

e-Filing Number

17-03-2026

Filing Number

1271/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

1128/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Cuddalore

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

42

Police Station

Srimushnam P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Boovaragavamurthy

    Adv. Raja SELVAKUMAR

  2. 2.Vadamalai

    Adv. Raja SELVAKUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer) Srimuhnam PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Bail

    The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to both petitioners (Boovaragavamurthy and Vadamalai) who were accused of assaulting a government VAO official during a public dispute over contaminated drinking water. The court found merit in the petitioners' contention of false implication and imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, daily police check-ins for 15 days, mobile tracking, and a prohibition on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1128/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to both petitioners (Boovaragavamurthy and Vadamalai) who were accused of assaulting a government VAO official during a public dispute over contaminated drinking water. The court found merit in the petitioners' contention of false implication and imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, daily police check-ins for 15 days, mobile tracking, and a prohibition on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case