Balu vs Sho Neyveli Township PS — 1124/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCD010021172026

Filing Number

1258/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

1124/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Cuddalore

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

58

Police Station

Neyveli Township P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Balu

    Adv. K.Selvakumar, BBA., BL.,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sho (Station House Officer) Neyveli Township PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    BailView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 1124/2026 Balu's bail petition was dismissed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Cuddalore on March 24, 2026. Balu was arrested on February 28, 2026 for alleged offences under Sections 123 and 275 of BNS and Section 24(1) of COTPA Act 2003. The court rejected bail despite the accused claiming false implication, citing the grave nature of the offence, seizure of 305 kg of contraband materials valued at Rs. 1,41,618, involvement of four vehicles, and incomplete investigation as grounds for detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1124/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 1124/2026 Balu's bail petition was dismissed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Cuddalore on March 24, 2026. Balu was arrested on February 28, 2026 for alleged offences under Sections 123 and 275 of BNS and Section 24(1) of COTPA Act 2003. The court rejected bail despite the accused claiming false implication, citing the grave nature of the offence, seizure of 305 kg of contraband materials valued at Rs. 1,41,618, involvement of four vehicles, and incomplete investigation as grounds for detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case