THAIYALNAYAGI vs SHO Mangalampettai ps — 1111/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCD010021092026
e-Filing Number
17-03-2026
Filing Number
1251/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
1111/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Cuddalore
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
37
Police Station
Mangalampettai P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THAIYALNAYAGI
Adv. Parames waran
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHO (Station House Officer) Mangalampettai ps (Police Station)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
BailView PDF
Case 1111/2026 Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Cuddalore granted anticipatory bail to Thaiyalnayagi, accused under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) for an incident on 04.03.2026, considering that the injured was discharged from hospital and the co-accused released on bail. The court imposed strict conditions including Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police station reporting for 15 days, cooperation with investigation, no absconding, mobile location tracking, and prohibition from leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1111/2026
Case 1111/2026 Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Cuddalore granted anticipatory bail to Thaiyalnayagi, accused under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) for an incident on 04.03.2026, considering that the injured was discharged from hospital and the co-accused released on bail. The court imposed strict conditions including Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police station reporting for 15 days, cooperation with investigation, no absconding, mobile location tracking, and prohibition from leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts