Anjallai Ammal Alias Anjalai Ammal vs Sho Chidambaram Towns PS — 1123/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCD010020932026

Filing Number

1237/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

1123/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Cuddalore

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

Chidambaram Town P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

1.Anjallai Ammal Alias Anjalai Ammal

Adv. R. Vasu, B.A., B.L.,

Respondent(s)

1.Sho (Station House Officer) Chidambaram Towns PS (Police Station)

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
24-Mar-2026

Bail

Case 1123/2026 Summary The Principal Sessions Court, Cuddalore dismissed a bail petition filed by two accused (Anjallai Ammal, 60, and Nethra, 33) charged under Section 303(2) BNS for allegedly stealing 6 sovereigns of gold on 21.02.2026. The court denied bail after considering that the accused are habitual offenders with three previous pending cases, the investigation remains incomplete, and the offense is grave in nature, despite the accused having been in judicial custody for 32 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
24-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal District and Sessions Judge
23-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
18-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 1123/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 1123/2026 Summary The Principal Sessions Court, Cuddalore dismissed a bail petition filed by two accused (Anjallai Ammal, 60, and Nethra, 33) charged under Section 303(2) BNS for allegedly stealing 6 sovereigns of gold on 21.02.2026. The court denied bail after considering that the accused are habitual offenders with three previous pending cases, the investigation remains incomplete, and the offense is grave in nature, despite the accused having been in judicial custody for 32 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.