Jaisankar Alias Jayasankar vs Sho cuddalore OT PS — 1108/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 24th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCD010020472026
Filing Number
1229/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
1108/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Cuddalore
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
115
Police Station
Cuddalore O.T. P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jaisankar Alias Jayasankar
Adv. Mu. Arivudainambi @ Gnanasekaran, BA., LLB.,
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sho (Station House Officer) cuddalore OT PS (Police Station)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Bail
Case Summary: 1108/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Cuddalore dismissed Jaisankar's anticipatory bail petition filed under Section 482 BNSS on 24 March 2026. Jaisankar was charged under Sections 296(B), 118(1), and 351(3) BNS for an alleged incident on 13 March 2026, which arose from a civil dispute over house measurement. The court rejected the bail plea, holding that the offence was grave in nature and investigation remained incomplete, despite the petitioner's claims of false implication and the injured party's hospital discharge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1108/2026
Case Summary: 1108/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Cuddalore dismissed Jaisankar's anticipatory bail petition filed under Section 482 BNSS on 24 March 2026. Jaisankar was charged under Sections 296(B), 118(1), and 351(3) BNS for an alleged incident on 13 March 2026, which arose from a civil dispute over house measurement. The court rejected the bail plea, holding that the offence was grave in nature and investigation remained incomplete, despite the petitioner's claims of false implication and the injured party's hospital discharge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts