Subash vs SHO Oomangalam PS — 1088/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCD010020392026

e-Filing Number

16-03-2026

Filing Number

1222/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

1088/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Cuddalore

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

33

Police Station

Oomangalam P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Subash

    Adv. Raja SELVAKUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer) Oomangalam PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    BailView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Cuddalore granted anticipatory bail to Subash (age 27) on March 18, 2026, who was accused of offences under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 324(4) related to an incident on January 26, 2026. The court was persuaded by the fact that the injured party had been discharged from the hospital and granted bail on a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to strict conditions including daily police reporting for 15 days, providing mobile numbers with location tracking enabled, and cooperation with investigation without absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1088/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Cuddalore granted anticipatory bail to Subash (age 27) on March 18, 2026, who was accused of offences under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 324(4) related to an incident on January 26, 2026. The court was persuaded by the fact that the injured party had been discharged from the hospital and granted bail on a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to strict conditions including daily police reporting for 15 days, providing mobile numbers with location tracking enabled, and cooperation with investigation without absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case