Jayaganthan vs SHO Karuveppilankurichi PS — 1095/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483 1 b. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCD010020022026

Filing Number

1194/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

1095/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Cuddalore

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1

Police Station

Karuveppilankurichi P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483 1 b

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jayaganthan

    Adv. J.Karthikeyan, BA., BL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer) Karuveppilankurichi PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Bail

    Case Summary: Jayaganthan v. SHO Karuveppilankurichi PS (CMP 1095/2026) The Principal Sessions Judge modified bail conditions imposed on accused Jayaganthan in a Section 108 BNS case. The court relaxed the requirement for daily police station appearances at 10:30 AM to monthly appearances on the 1st of each calendar month until chargesheet filing, recognizing the accused's consistent compliance over 36 days and his status as sole family breadwinner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1095/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Jayaganthan v. SHO Karuveppilankurichi PS (CMP 1095/2026) The Principal Sessions Judge modified bail conditions imposed on accused Jayaganthan in a Section 108 BNS case. The court relaxed the requirement for daily police station appearances at 10:30 AM to monthly appearances on the 1st of each calendar month until chargesheet filing, recognizing the accused's consistent compliance over 36 days and his status as sole family breadwinner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case