Gubendiran vs Sho Kadampuliyur PS — 1030/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCD010018142026
Filing Number
1142/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
1030/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Cuddalore
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
30
Police Station
Kadampuliyur P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Gubendiran
Adv. S. Elayaraja
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sho (Station House Officer) Kadampuliyur PS (Police Station)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
BailView PDF
Case 1030/2026 Summary: Gubendiran's bail petition was dismissed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Cuddalore, on 18 March 2026. Accused of serious offences including potential murder-related charges, Gubendiran had been in judicial custody for 48 days since his arrest on 30 January 2026. The court rejected bail, citing the grave nature of offences, incomplete investigation, and prosecution's strong objections despite defence arguments of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1030/2026
Case 1030/2026 Summary: Gubendiran's bail petition was dismissed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Cuddalore, on 18 March 2026. Accused of serious offences including potential murder-related charges, Gubendiran had been in judicial custody for 48 days since his arrest on 30 January 2026. The court rejected bail, citing the grave nature of offences, incomplete investigation, and prosecution's strong objections despite defence arguments of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts