Subramaniyan and 3 others vs SHO Kurinjipadi ps — 1024/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCD010018132026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
1141/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
1024/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Cuddalore
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
56
Police Station
Kurinjipady P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Subramaniyan and 3 others
Adv. Kavi arasan
-
2.Vasantha
Adv. Kavi arasan
-
3.Devaki
Adv. Kavi arasan
-
4.Meenachi
Adv. Kavi arasan
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHO (Station House Officer) Kurinjipadi ps (Police Station)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Bail
Case Summary: 1024/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to four accused (Subramaniyan, Vasantha, Devaki, and Meenachi) charged under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) in a case arising from a March 7, 2026 incident. The court found the FIR stemmed from a petty quarrel and noted the injured party was discharged from hospital, warranting bail despite ongoing investigation and a counter-case. Bail was conditional on Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily police check-ins for 15 days, cooperation with investigation, no tampering with evidence/witnesses, and restricted travel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1024/2026
Case Summary: 1024/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to four accused (Subramaniyan, Vasantha, Devaki, and Meenachi) charged under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) in a case arising from a March 7, 2026 incident. The court found the FIR stemmed from a petty quarrel and noted the injured party was discharged from hospital, warranting bail despite ongoing investigation and a counter-case. Bail was conditional on Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily police check-ins for 15 days, cooperation with investigation, no tampering with evidence/witnesses, and restricted travel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts