M/s Sriram Transport Finance Company Limited, rep by its Authorised Signatory vs Kalaiyarasan and one another — 21/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR21R11,2. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNCD010013042023

Filing Number

347/2023

Filing Date

06-Feb-2023

Registration No

21/2023

Registration Date

09-Feb-2023

Court

Principal District Court, Cuddalore

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section OR21R11,2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s Sriram Transport Finance Company Limited, rep by its Authorised Signatory

    Adv. D. Prasanna Bharathi, B.Sc.,B.L.,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kalaiyarasan and one another

  2. 2.Sankar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

    The Principal District Court at Cuddalore dismissed the Execution Petition filed by Sriram Transport Finance Company Limited against respondents Kalaiyarasan and another on 18-03-2026. The petition was dismissed for default, with the court noting that evidence against R1 (first respondent) was lacking or dismissal batta (costs) remained unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 27-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  10. 20-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  11. 07-Apr-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  12. 13-Feb-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  13. 27-Jan-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  14. 26-Nov-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  15. 24-Sep-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  16. 22-Aug-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  17. 22-Jul-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  18. 21-Jun-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  19. 06-Apr-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  20. 06-Mar-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  21. 07-Feb-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  22. 20-Dec-2023

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  23. 17-Nov-2023

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  24. 13-Oct-2023

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  25. 13-Sep-2023

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  26. 16-Aug-2023

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  27. 12-Jul-2023

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  28. 16-Jun-2023

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  29. 17-Apr-2023

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  30. 09-Mar-2023

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  31. 09-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 06-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 21/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District Court at Cuddalore dismissed the Execution Petition filed by Sriram Transport Finance Company Limited against respondents Kalaiyarasan and another on 18-03-2026. The petition was dismissed for default, with the court noting that evidence against R1 (first respondent) was lacking or dismissal batta (costs) remained unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case