Canara Bank Annur Branch vs M Parvathi Advocate - Merrish.K.K — 88/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order VII Rule 1. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

Judgement Next hearing 28-Apr-2026 this date has passed

COS - Commercial Original Suit

CNR: TNCB230023002024

e-Filing Number

19-11-2024

Filing Number

1458/2024

Filing Date

09-Dec-2024

Registration No

88/2025

Registration Date

27-Feb-2025

Court

Commercial Court in the Cadre of Senior Civil Judge, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order VII Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Canara Bank Annur Branch

    Adv. Senthil Kumar D

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M Parvathi Advocate - Merrish.K.K

Case History

  1. 28-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary: This is a Commercial Court case (C.O.S. No. 88 of 2025) from Coimbatore dated February 18, 2026, involving a bank loan dispute. The defendant (Mrs. Parvathi) gave her examination-in-chief testimony on affidavit, affirming its contents as truthful, followed by the plaintiff bank's cross-examination. The defendant denied receiving any loan of ₹5 lakh from Canara Bank, disputed the authenticity of signatures on loan documents, and claimed she never visited the bank or signed any agreements, contending the bank fabricated documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  10. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  11. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  12. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  13. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  14. 11-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  15. 01-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  16. 28-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  17. 25-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  18. 16-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  19. 17-Sep-2025

    Issues

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  20. 22-Aug-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  21. 02-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  22. 22-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  23. 14-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  24. 09-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  25. 01-Apr-2025

    Issue of Service

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  26. 07-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  27. 27-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 09-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 88/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a Commercial Court case (C.O.S. No. 88 of 2025) from Coimbatore dated February 18, 2026, involving a bank loan dispute. The defendant (Mrs. Parvathi) gave her examination-in-chief testimony on affidavit, affirming its contents as truthful, followed by the plaintiff bank's cross-examination. The defendant denied receiving any loan of ₹5 lakh from Canara Bank, disputed the authenticity of signatures on loan documents, and claimed she never visited the bank or signed any agreements, contending the bank fabricated documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case