State Bank of India SMECC Rep by Mr Savan Prakash vs Suganya D Prop of First Wear Clothing Advocate - VIGNESH K — 194/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER VII RULE 1. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 30th March 2026.
COS - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: TNCB230022812024
e-Filing Number
08-11-2024
Filing Number
1439/2024
Filing Date
05-12-2024
Registration No
194/2025
Registration Date
05-06-2025
Court
Commercial Court in the Cadre of Senior Civil Judge, Coimbatore
Judge
1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Bank of India SMECC Rep by Mr Savan Prakash
Adv. Karuppuswamy S
Respondent(s)
Suganya D Prop of First Wear Clothing Advocate - VIGNESH K
Hearing History
Judge: 1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-02-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Commercial Court (Senior Civil Judge Cadre), Coimbatore decreed in favor of State Bank of India, ordering defendant Mrs. Suganya D to pay Rs. 10,33,684/- (principal outstanding on four loans) plus interest at 10.08% per annum until decree date and 6.00% thereafter until realization, with costs. The court found the defendant defaulted on loan repayment obligations despite proper notice and proceeded ex parte after defendant failed to file a written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Commercial Court (Senior Civil Judge Cadre), Coimbatore decreed in favor of State Bank of India, ordering defendant Mrs. Suganya D to pay Rs. 10,33,684/- (principal outstanding on four loans) plus interest at 10.08% per annum until decree date and 6.00% thereafter until realization, with costs. The court found the defendant defaulted on loan repayment obligations despite proper notice and proceeded ex parte after defendant failed to file a written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts