Elite Furniture Mart vs Madhu Jayanti International Pvt. Ltd Advocate - G.Chandura Ramanan — 737/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
COS - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: TNCB230017662024
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
1077/2024
Filing Date
13-09-2021
Registration No
737/2024
Registration Date
10-12-2021
Court
Commercial Court in the Cadre of Senior Civil Judge, Coimbatore
Judge
1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Elite Furniture Mart
Adv. Harisudhan.B
Respondent(s)
Madhu Jayanti International Pvt. Ltd Advocate - G.Chandura Ramanan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Mediation
Mediation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 21-01-2026 | Mediation |
| 09-12-2025 | Mediation |
Interim Orders
This is a Commercial Court order from Coimbatore (C.O.S. No. 737 of 2024, arising from O.S. No. 1486 of 2021) dated March 6, 2026, containing the defendant's cross-examination testimony in a contractual dispute. The defendant company claims it paid ₹69,63,504 of ₹75,84,276 owed to the plaintiff for maintenance and renovation work, withholding 8% pending completion of defect rectification. The court's cross-examination record shows the defendant contending the plaintiff's work was defective and incomplete, while the defendant maintains no formal written complaint was lodged and disputes liability for the outstanding ₹6,20,772. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Commercial Court order from Coimbatore (C.O.S. No. 737 of 2024, arising from O.S. No. 1486 of 2021) dated March 6, 2026, containing the defendant's cross-examination testimony in a contractual dispute. The defendant company claims it paid ₹69,63,504 of ₹75,84,276 owed to the plaintiff for maintenance and renovation work, withholding 8% pending completion of defect rectification. The court's cross-examination record shows the defendant contending the plaintiff's work was defective and incomplete, while the defendant maintains no formal written complaint was lodged and disputes liability for the outstanding ₹6,20,772. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts