Priyadharshini vs K Velappan — 807/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

IA Pending Next hearing 28-Apr-2026 this date has passed

COS - Commercial Original Suit

CNR: TNCB230012002024

e-Filing Number

05-06-2024

Filing Number

756/2024

Filing Date

06-Jun-2024

Registration No

807/2024

Registration Date

06-Sep-2024

Court

Commercial Court in the Cadre of Senior Civil Judge, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Priyadharshini

    Adv. Prasanth.R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K Velappan

Case History

  1. 28-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Commercial Court in Coimbatore allowed the defendant's petition to file an additional written statement under Order VIII Rule 9 of the CPC, but imposed a cost of Rs. 3,000 to be paid to the plaintiff by April 28, 2026. The court found that the additional pleadings were not inconsistent with earlier statements and were necessary for effective adjudication of the money recovery dispute involving a claimed outstanding balance of Rs. 3,47,200. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  9. 20-Jan-2026

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  10. 10-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  11. 21-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  12. 04-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  13. 13-Oct-2025

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  14. 19-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  15. 22-Aug-2025

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  16. 04-Aug-2025

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  17. 16-Jul-2025

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  18. 18-Jun-2025

    Admission

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  19. 06-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  20. 09-Apr-2025

    Written Statement

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  21. 05-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  22. 06-Feb-2025

    Batta

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  23. 06-Jan-2025

    Batta

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  24. 06-Dec-2024

    Batta

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  25. 11-Nov-2024

    Batta

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  26. 04-Oct-2024

    Batta

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  27. 13-Sep-2024

    Issue of Service

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  28. 06-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 06-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 807/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Commercial Court in Coimbatore allowed the defendant's petition to file an additional written statement under Order VIII Rule 9 of the CPC, but imposed a cost of Rs. 3,000 to be paid to the plaintiff by April 28, 2026. The court found that the additional pleadings were not inconsistent with earlier statements and were necessary for effective adjudication of the money recovery dispute involving a claimed outstanding balance of Rs. 3,47,200. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case