PENTACLE NEWYORK COMPANY vs NSR DECORS Advocate - Elangovan M — 282/2025

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order 7 Rule 1. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 30th March 2026.

COS - Commercial Original Suit

CNR: TNCB230007022025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

29-07-2025

Filing Number

718/2025

Filing Date

06-08-2025

Registration No

282/2025

Registration Date

06-08-2025

Court

Commercial Court in the Cadre of Senior Civil Judge, Coimbatore

Judge

1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section Order 7 Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

PENTACLE NEWYORK COMPANY

Adv. Malini S

Respondent(s)

NSR DECORS Advocate - Elangovan M

Hearing History

Judge: 1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

30-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Judgement

03-03-2026

Arguments

18-02-2026

Evidence

20-01-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The Commercial Court in Coimbatore dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking recovery of ₹3,57,000 from the defendant. The court found that the two Memoranda of Understanding (agreements) between the parties contained unconscionable and unenforceable clauses—including requirements to handover banking credentials and control of accounts—that violated banking confidentiality norms and public policy under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Additionally, the court noted the plaintiff failed to deliver the promised designs to the defendant, further undermining the enforceability of the agreements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Commercial Court in Coimbatore dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking recovery of ₹3,57,000 from the defendant. The court found that the two Memoranda of Understanding (agreements) between the parties contained unconscionable and unenforceable clauses—including requirements to handover banking credentials and control of accounts—that violated banking confidentiality norms and public policy under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Additionally, the court noted the plaintiff failed to deliver the promised designs to the defendant, further undermining the enforceability of the agreements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Commercial Court in the Cadre of Senior Civil Judge, Coimbatore All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case