Glosil International Private Limited vs Lakshmi Motors — 250/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 7. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
COS - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: TNCB230006462024
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
28-02-2024
Filing Number
412/2024
Filing Date
12-03-2024
Registration No
250/2024
Registration Date
12-03-2024
Court
Commercial Court in the Cadre of Senior Civil Judge, Coimbatore
Judge
1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Glosil International Private Limited
Adv. Vivegagurubaran Gnanagurubaran
Respondent(s)
Lakshmi Motors
Hearing History
Judge: 1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 28-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 11-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Commercial Court case (C.O.S. No. 250 of 2024) from Coimbatore dated July 15, 2025, involving a dispute between auto spare parts distributors. The case concerns whether defendant Lakshmi Motors violated a distributorship agreement by directly selling products to customers who were already supplied by plaintiff. The court heard testimonies from both parties regarding the nature of their relationship, payment terms, and alleged breach of exclusivity. The case has been admitted/allowed for trial to proceed on merits, as indicated by the judge's final conclusion that the case should be permitted to continue with full examination of evidence and arguments from both sides. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Commercial Court case (C.O.S. No. 250 of 2024) from Coimbatore dated July 15, 2025, involving a dispute between auto spare parts distributors. The case concerns whether defendant Lakshmi Motors violated a distributorship agreement by directly selling products to customers who were already supplied by plaintiff. The court heard testimonies from both parties regarding the nature of their relationship, payment terms, and alleged breach of exclusivity. The case has been admitted/allowed for trial to proceed on merits, as indicated by the judge's final conclusion that the case should be permitted to continue with full examination of evidence and arguments from both sides. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts