Shriram Chits Tamilnadu (P) Ltd vs R.Senthilkumar — 72/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o21R11(2). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 06th March 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNCB230003832025
Filing Number
393/2025
Filing Date
02-01-2020
Registration No
72/2025
Registration Date
09-01-2020
Court
Commercial Court in the Cadre of Senior Civil Judge, Coimbatore
Judge
1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shriram Chits Tamilnadu (P) Ltd
Respondent(s)
R.Senthilkumar
S.Baby
Hearing History
Judge: 1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 10-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 08-01-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 04-12-2025 | For further Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Coimbatore Commercial Court dismissed the execution petition filed by M/s. Shriram Chits Tamilnadu (P) Ltd. against judgment debtors R. Senthilkumar and S. Baby. The court found that despite multiple opportunities and conditional orders, the petitioner failed to take steps for service of the respondents, constituting an abuse of court process, and dismissed the petition in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Coimbatore Commercial Court dismissed the execution petition filed by M/s. Shriram Chits Tamilnadu (P) Ltd. against judgment debtors R. Senthilkumar and S. Baby. The court found that despite multiple opportunities and conditional orders, the petitioner failed to take steps for service of the respondents, constituting an abuse of court process, and dismissed the petition in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts