PREMIER HOMES REPRESENTED BY VEERAMANI ALIAS PRIYA vs Rich Land Builders rep by Sasithra Dhamodharan Advocate - Sivakumar.P — 197/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 7 RULE 1. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 30th April 2026.
COS - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: TNCB230003702025
e-Filing Number
30-04-2025
Filing Number
380/2025
Filing Date
05-06-2025
Registration No
197/2025
Registration Date
05-06-2025
Court
Commercial Court in the Cadre of Senior Civil Judge, Coimbatore
Judge
1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PREMIER HOMES REPRESENTED BY VEERAMANI ALIAS PRIYA
Adv. Loganathan.V
VEERAMANI ALIAS PRIYA
Adv. Loganathan.V
Vasantha
Adv. Loganathan.V
Velmurugan
Adv. Loganathan.V
Respondent(s)
Rich Land Builders rep by Sasithra Dhamodharan Advocate - Sivakumar.P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 28-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 16-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 10-04-2026 | IA Pending |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Commercial Court, Coimbatore rejected the plaintiff's suit holding that it was barred under Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. The court found that the plaintiffs (Premier Homes and partners) filed a suit for recovery of money against defendants without being registered as a partnership firm on the date of filing, violating the mandatory registration requirement under Section 69(2). The court ruled that suits by unregistered partnership firms against third parties are void and not maintainable, allowing the defendants' petition to reject the plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Commercial Court, Coimbatore rejected the plaintiff's suit holding that it was barred under Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. The court found that the plaintiffs (Premier Homes and partners) filed a suit for recovery of money against defendants without being registered as a partnership firm on the date of filing, violating the mandatory registration requirement under Section 69(2). The court ruled that suits by unregistered partnership firms against third parties are void and not maintainable, allowing the defendants' petition to reject the plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts