PREMIER HOMES REPRESENTED BY VEERAMANI ALIAS PRIYA vs Rich Land Builders rep by Sasithra Dhamodharan Advocate - Sivakumar.P — 197/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 7 RULE 1. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 30th April 2026.

COS - Commercial Original Suit

CNR: TNCB230003702025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

30-04-2025

Filing Number

380/2025

Filing Date

05-06-2025

Registration No

197/2025

Registration Date

05-06-2025

Court

Commercial Court in the Cadre of Senior Civil Judge, Coimbatore

Judge

1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

Decision Date

30th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 7 RULE 1

Petitioner(s)

PREMIER HOMES REPRESENTED BY VEERAMANI ALIAS PRIYA

Adv. Loganathan.V

VEERAMANI ALIAS PRIYA

Adv. Loganathan.V

Vasantha

Adv. Loganathan.V

Velmurugan

Adv. Loganathan.V

Respondent(s)

Rich Land Builders rep by Sasithra Dhamodharan Advocate - Sivakumar.P

Hearing History

Judge: 1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

30-04-2026

Disposed

29-04-2026

IA Pending

28-04-2026

IA Pending

16-04-2026

IA Pending

10-04-2026

IA Pending

Final Orders / Judgements

30-04-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The Commercial Court, Coimbatore rejected the plaintiff's suit holding that it was barred under Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. The court found that the plaintiffs (Premier Homes and partners) filed a suit for recovery of money against defendants without being registered as a partnership firm on the date of filing, violating the mandatory registration requirement under Section 69(2). The court ruled that suits by unregistered partnership firms against third parties are void and not maintainable, allowing the defendants' petition to reject the plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Commercial Court, Coimbatore rejected the plaintiff's suit holding that it was barred under Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. The court found that the plaintiffs (Premier Homes and partners) filed a suit for recovery of money against defendants without being registered as a partnership firm on the date of filing, violating the mandatory registration requirement under Section 69(2). The court ruled that suits by unregistered partnership firms against third parties are void and not maintainable, allowing the defendants' petition to reject the plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Commercial Court in the Cadre of Senior Civil Judge, Coimbatore All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case