PREMIER HOMES REPRESENTED BY VEERAMANI ALIAS PRIYA vs Rich Land Builders rep by Sasithra Dhamodharan Advocate - Sivakumar.P — 197/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 7 RULE 1. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

COS - Commercial Original Suit

CNR: TNCB230003702025

e-Filing Number

30-04-2025

Filing Number

380/2025

Filing Date

05-Jun-2025

Registration No

197/2025

Registration Date

05-Jun-2025

Court

Commercial Court in the Cadre of Senior Civil Judge, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 7 RULE 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PREMIER HOMES REPRESENTED BY VEERAMANI ALIAS PRIYA

    Adv. Loganathan.V

  2. 2.VEERAMANI ALIAS PRIYA

    Adv. Loganathan.V

  3. 3.Vasantha

    Adv. Loganathan.V

  4. 4.Velmurugan

    Adv. Loganathan.V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rich Land Builders rep by Sasithra Dhamodharan Advocate - Sivakumar.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Commercial Court, Coimbatore rejected the plaintiff's suit holding that it was barred under Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. The court found that the plaintiffs (Premier Homes and partners) filed a suit for recovery of money against defendants without being registered as a partnership firm on the date of filing, violating the mandatory registration requirement under Section 69(2). The court ruled that suits by unregistered partnership firms against third parties are void and not maintainable, allowing the defendants' petition to reject the plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  7. 10-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  8. 08-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  9. 26-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  10. 13-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  11. 11-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  12. 23-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  13. 16-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  14. 09-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  15. 06-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  16. 09-Jan-2026

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  17. 02-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  18. 14-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  19. 31-Oct-2025

    IA Pending

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  20. 07-Oct-2025

    Admission

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  21. 29-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  22. 07-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  23. 23-Jun-2025

    Batta

    Commercial Court In The Cadre Of Senior CIVIL Judge

  24. 05-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 05-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 197/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Commercial Court, Coimbatore rejected the plaintiff's suit holding that it was barred under Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. The court found that the plaintiffs (Premier Homes and partners) filed a suit for recovery of money against defendants without being registered as a partnership firm on the date of filing, violating the mandatory registration requirement under Section 69(2). The court ruled that suits by unregistered partnership firms against third parties are void and not maintainable, allowing the defendants' petition to reject the plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case