State Bank Of India vs Shruthi Fashion Designers — 239/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section 26,Section 151. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 06th March 2026.
COS - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: TNCB230003302025
e-Filing Number
28-04-2025
Filing Number
340/2025
Filing Date
03-06-2025
Registration No
239/2025
Registration Date
25-06-2025
Court
Commercial Court in the Cadre of Senior Civil Judge, Coimbatore
Judge
1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Bank Of India
Adv. Mohan Rajkumar
Respondent(s)
Shruthi Fashion Designers
Hearing History
Judge: 1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 13-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-01-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 15-12-2025 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Commercial Court at Coimbatore decreed the suit filed by State Bank of India against M/s. Shruthi Fashion Designers and Mrs. S. Selvi for recovery of Rs. 4,30,241/- (comprising Rs. 3,58,359/- for Cash Credit Loan and Rs. 71,882/- for FITL Loan), with future interest at 12.40% p.a. until decree and 6% p.a. thereafter until realization. The court held that the defendants defaulted on loan obligations despite multiple reminders and legal notice, and relied on unchallenged bank account statements as primary evidence to establish liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Commercial Court at Coimbatore decreed the suit filed by State Bank of India against M/s. Shruthi Fashion Designers and Mrs. S. Selvi for recovery of Rs. 4,30,241/- (comprising Rs. 3,58,359/- for Cash Credit Loan and Rs. 71,882/- for FITL Loan), with future interest at 12.40% p.a. until decree and 6% p.a. thereafter until realization. The court held that the defendants defaulted on loan obligations despite multiple reminders and legal notice, and relied on unchallenged bank account statements as primary evidence to establish liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts