Canara Bank Jothipuram Branch vs Prince R Charles Advocate - Manoharan.A — 13/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER VII RULE 1 OF CPC,SECTION 2(i)(c) OF CCA. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

COS - Commercial Original Suit

CNR: TNCB230000432025

Evidence

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

e-Filing Number

30-12-2024

Filing Number

44/2025

Filing Date

07-01-2025

Registration No

13/2025

Registration Date

08-01-2025

Court

Commercial Court in the Cadre of Senior Civil Judge, Coimbatore

Judge

1-

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER VII RULE 1 OF CPC,SECTION 2(i)(c) OF CCA

Petitioner(s)

Canara Bank Jothipuram Branch

Adv. D SENTHILKUMAR Rameshkannan

Respondent(s)

Prince R Charles Advocate - Manoharan.A

Hearing History

Judge: 1-

27-04-2026

Evidence

06-04-2026

Evidence

11-03-2026

Evidence

04-03-2026

Evidence

09-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

23-01-2026
Copy of Order

Court Order Summary The petition filed by defendants seeking condonation of delay (29 days) to file a written statement after the 120-day statutory deadline under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 has been dismissed. The court held that the 120-day timeline for filing written statements is mandatory and cannot be extended even for hardship circumstances like the death of the 2nd defendant, citing Supreme Court precedent that such extensions apply only during extraordinary situations like COVID-19 pandemic. The defendants retain the right to cross-examine the plaintiff's evidence and pleadings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary The petition filed by defendants seeking condonation of delay (29 days) to file a written statement after the 120-day statutory deadline under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 has been dismissed. The court held that the 120-day timeline for filing written statements is mandatory and cannot be extended even for hardship circumstances like the death of the 2nd defendant, citing Supreme Court precedent that such extensions apply only during extraordinary situations like COVID-19 pandemic. The defendants retain the right to cross-examine the plaintiff's evidence and pleadings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Commercial Court in the Cadre of Senior Civil Judge, Coimbatore All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case