Canara Bank Jothipuram Branch vs Prince R Charles Advocate - Manoharan.A — 13/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER VII RULE 1 OF CPC,SECTION 2(i)(c) OF CCA. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
COS - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: TNCB230000432025
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
30-12-2024
Filing Number
44/2025
Filing Date
07-01-2025
Registration No
13/2025
Registration Date
08-01-2025
Court
Commercial Court in the Cadre of Senior Civil Judge, Coimbatore
Judge
1-
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Canara Bank Jothipuram Branch
Adv. D SENTHILKUMAR Rameshkannan
Respondent(s)
Prince R Charles Advocate - Manoharan.A
Hearing History
Judge: 1-
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary The petition filed by defendants seeking condonation of delay (29 days) to file a written statement after the 120-day statutory deadline under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 has been dismissed. The court held that the 120-day timeline for filing written statements is mandatory and cannot be extended even for hardship circumstances like the death of the 2nd defendant, citing Supreme Court precedent that such extensions apply only during extraordinary situations like COVID-19 pandemic. The defendants retain the right to cross-examine the plaintiff's evidence and pleadings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary The petition filed by defendants seeking condonation of delay (29 days) to file a written statement after the 120-day statutory deadline under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 has been dismissed. The court held that the 120-day timeline for filing written statements is mandatory and cannot be extended even for hardship circumstances like the death of the 2nd defendant, citing Supreme Court precedent that such extensions apply only during extraordinary situations like COVID-19 pandemic. The defendants retain the right to cross-examine the plaintiff's evidence and pleadings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts