K.Balasubramanian vs Bharati Infratel Ventures Ltd., — 12/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 151,. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
COS - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: TNCB230000232023
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
12/2023
Filing Date
24-09-2020
Registration No
12/2023
Registration Date
08-10-2020
Court
Commercial Court in the Cadre of Senior Civil Judge, Coimbatore
Judge
1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.Balasubramanian
Adv. Suresh.S
Respondent(s)
Bharati Infratel Ventures Ltd.,
Bharati Infratel Ventures Ltd.,
Indus Towers Ltd.,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 06-04-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 23-02-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 11-02-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Commercial Court, Coimbatore allowed Indus Towers Limited's petition to file additional documents (Nos. 2-5) that were obtained after the written statement was filed. However, the court imposed a cost of ₹2,000 to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff by November 12, 2025, conditioned on the documents being subject to proof, relevancy, and admissibility determinations during trial. The court balanced the Commercial Courts Act's objective of expeditious disposal with principles of natural justice, allowing the documents since the suit was transferred to the Commercial Court and the defendant had recently obtained authorization to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Commercial Court, Coimbatore allowed Indus Towers Limited's petition to file additional documents (Nos. 2-5) that were obtained after the written statement was filed. However, the court imposed a cost of ₹2,000 to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff by November 12, 2025, conditioned on the documents being subject to proof, relevancy, and admissibility determinations during trial. The court balanced the Commercial Courts Act's objective of expeditious disposal with principles of natural justice, allowing the documents since the suit was transferred to the Commercial Court and the defendant had recently obtained authorization to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts