Anish Mathew Thomas vs Ramesh Iron and Steel Company India P Ltd Advocate - M.S.Balajee Sridhar — 33/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section ORDER VII RULE 1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
COS - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: TNCB220000762025
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
29-08-2025
Filing Number
98/2025
Filing Date
02-09-2025
Registration No
33/2025
Registration Date
02-09-2025
Court
Commercial Court in the Cadre of District Judge, Coimbatore
Judge
1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF DISTRICT JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anish Mathew Thomas
Adv. C.Srivatsan
Respondent(s)
Ramesh Iron and Steel Company India P Ltd Advocate - M.S.Balajee Sridhar
M S R Iron Steel Industries India Pvt Ltd
Adv. M.S.Balajee Sridhar
Balu Iron and Steel Company
Adv. M.S.Balajee Sridhar
Balu Cement Corporation
Adv. M.S.Balajee Sridhar
Sri Venkatramana Transports and logistics
Adv. M.S.Balajee Sridhar
Prabhu Balasubramanian
Adv. M.S.Balajee Sridhar
Kanakachalam Ganapathy
Adv. M.S.Balajee Sridhar
Karthik Balasubramanian
Adv. M.S.Balajee Sridhar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF DISTRICT JUDGE
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary In this commercial case (COS No. 33 of 2025) before the Coimbatore Commercial Court, the court examined testimony regarding a consultant employment dispute involving outstanding payments. The court found that the plaintiff consultant was owed ₹25.75 lakh for services rendered and rejected the defendant company's counter-claims, holding them legally unsustainable. The court directed the defendant to pay the full outstanding amount to the plaintiff consultant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In this commercial case (COS No. 33 of 2025) before the Coimbatore Commercial Court, the court examined testimony regarding a consultant employment dispute involving outstanding payments. The court found that the plaintiff consultant was owed ₹25.75 lakh for services rendered and rejected the defendant company's counter-claims, holding them legally unsustainable. The court directed the defendant to pay the full outstanding amount to the plaintiff consultant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts