Watertec India Private Limited, rep by its Authorised Signatory Mr.Mathew Job vs M/s.S.R.Polymers, rep by its Partners Advocate - S.Raveendran — 28/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7 Rule 11. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
COS - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: TNCB220000622025
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
e-Filing Number
08-07-2025
Filing Number
78/2025
Filing Date
10-07-2025
Registration No
28/2025
Registration Date
10-07-2025
Court
Commercial Court in the Cadre of District Judge, Coimbatore
Judge
1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF DISTRICT JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Watertec India Private Limited, rep by its Authorised Signatory Mr.Mathew Job
Adv. POORVAJA A R
Respondent(s)
M/s.S.R.Polymers, rep by its Partners Advocate - S.Raveendran
Hearing History
Judge: 1-COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF DISTRICT JUDGE
Orders
Orders
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Orders |
| 12-03-2026 | Orders |
| 10-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 07-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 06-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by M/s. S.R Polymers (defendant) seeking permission to file an additional written statement under Order VIII Rule 9 of the CPC has been allowed. The court granted this relief because the petition was filed at an early stage of proceedings, before commencement of evidence, the plaintiff raised no objection, and substantial justice requires allowing the defendant to include details omitted by oversight along with supporting documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by M/s. S.R Polymers (defendant) seeking permission to file an additional written statement under Order VIII Rule 9 of the CPC has been allowed. The court granted this relief because the petition was filed at an early stage of proceedings, before commencement of evidence, the plaintiff raised no objection, and substantial justice requires allowing the defendant to include details omitted by oversight along with supporting documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts