P. Shanmughasundaram vs N. Rathinasamy Advocate - Ramlingham.K.V — 220/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

IA Pending Next hearing 02-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCB210023072024

Filing Number

279/2024

Filing Date

21-Jul-2007

Registration No

220/2024

Registration Date

21-Jul-2007

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P. Shanmughasundaram

    Adv. Yogalakshmi.C

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.N. Rathinasamy Advocate - Ramlingham.K.V

Case History

  1. 02-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  9. 20-Jan-2026

    Steps

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  10. 06-Jan-2026

    Steps

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  11. 10-Dec-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  12. 24-Nov-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  13. 24-Nov-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The petition under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC to implead Balamani (the petitioner's wife) as the second plaintiff in the suit was allowed. The court held that although the property was transferred during litigation (pendente lite), the proposed party as a pendente lite transferee is bound by the original cause of action under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and qualifies as a proper party to the proceedings. No costs were awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 24-Nov-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  15. 11-Nov-2025

    Additional Issues

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  16. 07-Nov-2025

    Additional Issues

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  17. 23-Oct-2025

    Additional Issues

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  18. 13-Oct-2025

    Additional Issues

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  19. 06-Oct-2025

    Additional Issues

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  20. 08-Sep-2025

    Additional Issues

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  21. 19-Aug-2025

    Additional Issues

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  22. 04-Aug-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  23. 25-Jul-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  24. 14-Jul-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  25. 01-Jul-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  26. 25-Jun-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  27. 19-Jun-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  28. 12-Jun-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  29. 09-Jun-2025

    Additional Issues

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  30. 04-Jun-2025

    Additional Issues

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  31. 24-Apr-2025

    Additional Issues

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  32. 03-Apr-2025

    Additional Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  33. 14-Mar-2025

    Additional Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  34. 03-Mar-2025

    Additional Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  35. 26-Feb-2025

    Additional Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  36. 05-Feb-2025

    Additional Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  37. 20-Dec-2024

    Additional Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  38. 25-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 21-Jul-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. 220/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC to implead Balamani (the petitioner's wife) as the second plaintiff in the suit was allowed. The court held that although the property was transferred during litigation (pendente lite), the proposed party as a pendente lite transferee is bound by the original cause of action under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and qualifies as a proper party to the proceedings. No costs were awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case