Sub Inspector of Police, Annur P.S vs SUBRAMANIYAM — 168/2025
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCB210016892025
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
e-Filing Number
05-09-2025
Filing Number
1515/2025
Filing Date
10-09-2025
Registration No
168/2025
Registration Date
25-09-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur
Judge
1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ANNUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Inspector of Police, Annur P.S
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANNUR POLICE STATION
Respondent(s)
SUBRAMANIYAM
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ANNUR
Evidence
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
Questioning
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 04-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-02-2026 | Questioning |
Interim Orders
Summary: Prosecution witness P.W.1 (Murugan, age 40) testified in Case No. C.C.No. 168/2025 before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur on 04.03.2026. The witness deposed regarding the seizure of approximately 2 liters of coconut items on 02.08.2025 from the accused Subramaniam's property, and confirmed his signatures on the seizure and destruction memos. During cross-examination, the accused challenged the witness's testimony regarding the location and seizure details, but the witness maintained his statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Prosecution witness P.W.1 (Murugan, age 40) testified in Case No. C.C.No. 168/2025 before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur on 04.03.2026. The witness deposed regarding the seizure of approximately 2 liters of coconut items on 02.08.2025 from the accused Subramaniam's property, and confirmed his signatures on the seizure and destruction memos. During cross-examination, the accused challenged the witness's testimony regarding the location and seizure details, but the witness maintained his statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts