Ramamoorthy vs Suseela Advocate - Devi Saravanan.P — 344/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7 R1. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCB210016872023

Trial

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

Filing Number

353/2023

Filing Date

03-07-2023

Registration No

344/2023

Registration Date

03-07-2023

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur

Judge

1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ANNUR

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7 R1

Petitioner(s)

Ramamoorthy

Adv. Santhamoorthy.R

Respondent(s)

Suseela Advocate - Devi Saravanan.P

Hearing History

Judge: 1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ANNUR

10-03-2026

Trial

16-12-2025

Trial

23-09-2025

Trial

24-06-2025

Trial

25-03-2025

Trial

Interim Orders

04-07-2024
Copy of Order

SUMMARY: The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur, dismissed the plaintiff's petition for temporary injunction on July 4, 2024. The plaintiff sought to restrain defendants from preventing his use of a 10-foot wide cart-track through properties in S.F. Nos. 407/1 and 407/2 to access his property in S.F. No. 407/3. The court found insufficient documentary evidence specifically establishing the existence of the disputed cart-track at the eastern extremity of the contested properties and held that consequential relief (injunction) cannot be granted before determining the plaintiff's underlying right through full trial. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur, dismissed the plaintiff's petition for temporary injunction on July 4, 2024. The plaintiff sought to restrain defendants from preventing his use of a 10-foot wide cart-track through properties in S.F. Nos. 407/1 and 407/2 to access his property in S.F. No. 407/3. The court found insufficient documentary evidence specifically establishing the existence of the disputed cart-track at the eastern extremity of the contested properties and held that consequential relief (injunction) cannot be granted before determining the plaintiff's underlying right through full trial. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case