Ramamoorthy vs Suseela Advocate - Devi Saravanan.P — 344/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7 R1. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Trial Next hearing 16-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCB210016872023

Filing Number

353/2023

Filing Date

03-Jul-2023

Registration No

344/2023

Registration Date

03-Jul-2023

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7 R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramamoorthy

    Adv. Santhamoorthy.R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Suseela Advocate - Devi Saravanan.P

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  3. 16-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  4. 23-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  5. 24-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  6. 25-Mar-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  7. 30-Jan-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  8. 25-Nov-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  9. 29-Oct-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  10. 10-Sep-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  11. 07-Aug-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  12. 04-Jul-2024

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    SUMMARY: The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur, dismissed the plaintiff's petition for temporary injunction on July 4, 2024. The plaintiff sought to restrain defendants from preventing his use of a 10-foot wide cart-track through properties in S.F. Nos. 407/1 and 407/2 to access his property in S.F. No. 407/3. The court found insufficient documentary evidence specifically establishing the existence of the disputed cart-track at the eastern extremity of the contested properties and held that consequential relief (injunction) cannot be granted before determining the plaintiff's underlying right through full trial. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 04-Jul-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  14. 28-Jun-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  15. 25-Jun-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  16. 04-Jun-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  17. 10-Apr-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  18. 18-Mar-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  19. 06-Mar-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  20. 19-Feb-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  21. 08-Feb-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  22. 22-Jan-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  23. 08-Jan-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  24. 19-Dec-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  25. 11-Dec-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  26. 30-Nov-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  27. 21-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  28. 08-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  29. 30-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  30. 04-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  31. 03-Aug-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  32. 03-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 03-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 344/2023

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur, dismissed the plaintiff's petition for temporary injunction on July 4, 2024. The plaintiff sought to restrain defendants from preventing his use of a 10-foot wide cart-track through properties in S.F. Nos. 407/1 and 407/2 to access his property in S.F. No. 407/3. The court found insufficient documentary evidence specifically establishing the existence of the disputed cart-track at the eastern extremity of the contested properties and held that consequential relief (injunction) cannot be granted before determining the plaintiff's underlying right through full trial. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case