Inspector of Police, Annur P.S vs DHIYANAGURU — 95/2025
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCB210016142025
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
e-Filing Number
04-09-2025
Filing Number
1441/2025
Filing Date
06-09-2025
Registration No
95/2025
Registration Date
06-09-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur
Judge
1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ANNUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Annur P.S
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANNUR POLICE STATION
Respondent(s)
DHIYANAGURU
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ANNUR
Evidence
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
Questioning
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 04-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-02-2026 | Questioning |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness deposition record (P.W.2) in Criminal Case No. 95/2025 before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur, dated March 6, 2026. The prosecution witness testified about the arrest of an accused on April 16, 2025, for allegedly selling coconuts without authorization under Section 4(1)(C) of the TNP Act; the accused was later released on bail after the investigation concluded and a final charge sheet was filed. During cross-examination, discrepancies were noted regarding the time of the incident and the handling of evidence, with the witness admitting certain procedural lapses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness deposition record (P.W.2) in Criminal Case No. 95/2025 before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur, dated March 6, 2026. The prosecution witness testified about the arrest of an accused on April 16, 2025, for allegedly selling coconuts without authorization under Section 4(1)(C) of the TNP Act; the accused was later released on bail after the investigation concluded and a final charge sheet was filed. During cross-examination, discrepancies were noted regarding the time of the incident and the handling of evidence, with the witness admitting certain procedural lapses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts