Inspector of Police, Annur PS vs SANTHOSHKUMAR Advocate - Chandra Sekar K — 86/2025
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(AAA)TNPROACT. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCB210016002025
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
e-Filing Number
04-09-2025
Filing Number
1427/2025
Filing Date
06-09-2025
Registration No
86/2025
Registration Date
06-09-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur
Judge
1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ANNUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Annur PS (Police Station)
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
SANTHOSHKUMAR Advocate - Chandra Sekar K
PUSHPAVEL
Adv. Sathish.P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ANNUR
Arguments
Arguments
Questioning
Questioning
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 06-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 04-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a deposition of prosecution witness P.W.2 (54-year-old police officer) recorded on 06.03.2026 in Criminal Case No. 86/2025 before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur. The witness testified regarding the seizure of approximately 737 bottles (159.9 liters) of illicit liquor from a restaurant without proper authorization under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act. A Section 355 BNSS petition was filed and allowed during the proceedings; the first accused was present while the second accused was absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a deposition of prosecution witness P.W.2 (54-year-old police officer) recorded on 06.03.2026 in Criminal Case No. 86/2025 before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur. The witness testified regarding the seizure of approximately 737 bottles (159.9 liters) of illicit liquor from a restaurant without proper authorization under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act. A Section 355 BNSS petition was filed and allowed during the proceedings; the first accused was present while the second accused was absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts