Laksumi vs The District Collector — 148/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB210012562024
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
Filing Number
186/2024
Filing Date
30-04-2024
Registration No
148/2024
Registration Date
30-04-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur
Judge
1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ANNUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Laksumi
Adv. Nadesan
Respondent(s)
The District Collector
Tahsildar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ANNUR
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-12-2025 | Trial |
| 23-09-2025 | Trial |
| 24-06-2025 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Summary In O.S. No. 148/2024 before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of witness Lakshmi (PW-1) on 10.03.2026 regarding her claim that she is also known as Subbathaal and is the daughter of Ramanathakaundar. The witness testified and submitted documentary evidence including Aadhaar card, death certificate, heritage certificate, and land records (Patta No. 787) to establish her identity and lineage. The cross-examination of the defendant's side was also recorded, noting their contentions regarding the witness's name variations and sufficiency of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In O.S. No. 148/2024 before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of witness Lakshmi (PW-1) on 10.03.2026 regarding her claim that she is also known as Subbathaal and is the daughter of Ramanathakaundar. The witness testified and submitted documentary evidence including Aadhaar card, death certificate, heritage certificate, and land records (Patta No. 787) to establish her identity and lineage. The cross-examination of the defendant's side was also recorded, noting their contentions regarding the witness's name variations and sufficiency of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts