Manikandan vs Inspector of Police, Annur Police Station — 80/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB210004202026

Filing Number

369/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

80/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

84

Police Station

Annur police station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manikandan

    Adv. VIVEK.K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Annur Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur dismissed the bail petition of accused Manikandan, who was arrested on charges under BNS sections 331(3), 331(4), and 305(a) (theft-related offences). The court denied bail primarily because the accused is a habitual offender with more than 4 similar criminal cases registered against him, stolen property was recovered, and investigation remains pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Notice

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Notice

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Notice

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Annur

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 80/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur dismissed the bail petition of accused Manikandan, who was arrested on charges under BNS sections 331(3), 331(4), and 305(a) (theft-related offences). The court denied bail primarily because the accused is a habitual offender with more than 4 similar criminal cases registered against him, stolen property was recovered, and investigation remains pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case