Inspector of Police, Annur PS vs Kannammal Advocate - Chandrasekar.K — 61/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCB210003002026
Filing Number
265/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
61/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Annur
Judge
1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ANNUR
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Annur PS (Police Station)
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Kannammal Advocate - Chandrasekar.K
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ANNUR
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Orders
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Orders |
| 09-03-2026 | Orders |
| 06-03-2026 | Orders |
| 04-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District Munsif Court at Annur granted the petitioner's petition for return of 56 grams of gold nuggets seized in a criminal case, finding that keeping the property in police custody served no purpose and caused undue burden to the victim-petitioner whose ownership was undisputed. The court returned the property to the petitioner on interim custody subject to conditions including execution of a bond for Rs. 20,000 with surety, preparation of panchanama, and a prohibition on alienating the property until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District Munsif Court at Annur granted the petitioner's petition for return of 56 grams of gold nuggets seized in a criminal case, finding that keeping the property in police custody served no purpose and caused undue burden to the victim-petitioner whose ownership was undisputed. The court returned the property to the petitioner on interim custody subject to conditions including execution of a bond for Rs. 20,000 with surety, preparation of panchanama, and a prohibition on alienating the property until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts