R.Rani vs Rangasamy Advocate - Baskar.N — 171/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCB190009332022

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

02nd June 2026

Filing Number

679/2022

Filing Date

23-11-2022

Registration No

171/2022

Registration Date

23-11-2022

Court

Sub Court, Mettupalayam

Judge

2-Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

R.Rani

Adv. Sathish.M

Respondent(s)

Rangasamy Advocate - Baskar.N

Suntharam

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam

27-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

08-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

06-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

25-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

11-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

07-11-2023
Copy of Deposition

Summary This Tamil Nadu Subordinate Court order (Original Case No. 171/2022, dated November 7, 2023) involves a cross-examination of a witness regarding land registration documents (Vao.Saa.A.1). The court examined the witness's testimony about document registration dates, property details, and proper procedure compliance. The judge found several discrepancies in the witness's account regarding document filing dates, property area measurements, and whether proper procedures were followed during registration, ultimately finding the witness testimony unreliable on several material points. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This Tamil Nadu Subordinate Court order (Original Case No. 171/2022, dated November 7, 2023) involves a cross-examination of a witness regarding land registration documents (Vao.Saa.A.1). The court examined the witness's testimony about document registration dates, property details, and proper procedure compliance. The judge found several discrepancies in the witness's account regarding document filing dates, property area measurements, and whether proper procedures were followed during registration, ultimately finding the witness testimony unreliable on several material points. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Mettupalayam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case