Ramasamy vs Kandasamy and 3 others — 4/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section o7r1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCB190006842021

Arguments

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

580/2021

Filing Date

23-12-2021

Registration No

4/2022

Registration Date

31-01-2022

Court

Sub Court, Mettupalayam

Judge

2-Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section o7r1

Petitioner(s)

Ramasamy

Adv. Rajendran.P

Respondent(s)

Kandasamy and 3 others

Ramasamy

Adv. Santhamoorthy.R

Nagaraj

Saraswathy

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam

29-04-2026

Arguments

30-03-2026

Arguments

11-03-2026

Arguments

04-03-2026

Arguments

02-03-2026

Steps

Interim Orders

08-07-2025
Copy of Deposition

Case Summary Case: O.S.4/2022 | Court: Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam | Date: 08.07.2025 Outcome: The deposition of witness DW.1 (aged 75) was recorded on oath under the Oaths Act 1969. The witness testified regarding the death of his grandfather (Thiru M. Gowder) in 1954, providing details about the death certificate and succession matters under Hindu law. The court found several inconsistencies in the witness's testimony regarding the date of death and the authenticity of documents produced. The witness's deposition was completed and signed by the judge, with cross-examination noted as "nil" (no cross-examination by opposing counsel). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: O.S.4/2022 | Court: Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam | Date: 08.07.2025 Outcome: The deposition of witness DW.1 (aged 75) was recorded on oath under the Oaths Act 1969. The witness testified regarding the death of his grandfather (Thiru M. Gowder) in 1954, providing details about the death certificate and succession matters under Hindu law. The court found several inconsistencies in the witness's testimony regarding the date of death and the authenticity of documents produced. The witness's deposition was completed and signed by the judge, with cross-examination noted as "nil" (no cross-examination by opposing counsel). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Mettupalayam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case