Prasanth vs Manokaran — 250/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166(1)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 14th March 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNCB190006602025
e-Filing Number
13-10-2025
Filing Number
735/2025
Filing Date
15-10-2025
Registration No
250/2025
Registration Date
25-10-2025
Court
Sub Court, Mettupalayam
Judge
2-Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prasanth
Adv. VAIDEKI N
Respondent(s)
Manokaran
Vijayalakshmi M
United India Insurance Co Ltd
Adv. Kasthuri.K
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam
Disposed
Counter
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-02-2026 | Counter |
| 29-01-2026 | Appearance |
| 27-11-2025 | Appearance |
| 25-10-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 250/2025 The Lok Adalat settled the dispute between Prasanth (petitioner) and Manokaran, Vijayalakshmi M, and United India Insurance Co Ltd through a negotiated settlement of Rs. 20,000 (Twenty Thousand Rupees only). The insurance company (3rd respondent) was directed to deposit the settlement amount before the competent court within three months, with interest accruing if deposit is delayed. Upon deposit, the amount shall be disbursed to the petitioner through NEET/RTGS as per High Court directions, and court fees shall be refunded as per statutory provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 250/2025 The Lok Adalat settled the dispute between Prasanth (petitioner) and Manokaran, Vijayalakshmi M, and United India Insurance Co Ltd through a negotiated settlement of Rs. 20,000 (Twenty Thousand Rupees only). The insurance company (3rd respondent) was directed to deposit the settlement amount before the competent court within three months, with interest accruing if deposit is delayed. Upon deposit, the amount shall be disbursed to the petitioner through NEET/RTGS as per High Court directions, and court fees shall be refunded as per statutory provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts