Rajeev vs Akshay.T.S. — 143/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section sec166(1). Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 14th March 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNCB190006312023

Case disposed

Filing Number

586/2023

Filing Date

04-07-2023

Registration No

143/2023

Registration Date

05-07-2023

Court

Sub Court, Mettupalayam

Judge

2-Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section sec166(1)

Petitioner(s)

Rajeev

Adv. Prabhakaran.V

Respondent(s)

Akshay.T.S.

Gineesh E.K.

The Branch Manater

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Lok Adalat

12-03-2026

Restored

12-03-2026

Lok Adalat

13-03-2025

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Copy of Order

Case 143/2023 Summary: The Mettupalayam Taluk Legal Services Committee settled a vehicle insurance dispute between petitioner Rajeev and respondent Universal Sompo General Insurance Company Ltd through Lok Adalat. The court ordered the insurer to pay Rs. 2,50,000 (Two Lakhs Fifty Thousand) to the petitioner as full settlement, with the respondent having 45 days to remit the amount to the Sub Judge's account. Court fees paid by the petitioner shall be refunded, and both parties agreed to bear their respective costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

13-03-2025
Copy of Order
casestatus.in Summary

Case 143/2023 Summary: The Mettupalayam Taluk Legal Services Committee settled a vehicle insurance dispute between petitioner Rajeev and respondent Universal Sompo General Insurance Company Ltd through Lok Adalat. The court ordered the insurer to pay Rs. 2,50,000 (Two Lakhs Fifty Thousand) to the petitioner as full settlement, with the respondent having 45 days to remit the amount to the Sub Judge's account. Court fees paid by the petitioner shall be refunded, and both parties agreed to bear their respective costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Mettupalayam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case