Canara Bank, Sirumugai Branch vs Viswanathan — 52/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 13th March 2026.
COS - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: TNCB190004152025
e-Filing Number
23-06-2025
Filing Number
454/2025
Filing Date
27-Jun-2025
Registration No
52/2025
Registration Date
29-Oct-2025
Court
Sub Court, Mettupalayam
Judge
2-Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Last updated 18-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Canara Bank, Sirumugai Branch
Adv. SACHITHANANDA KUMAR ARJUNAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Viswanathan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of DecreeView PDF
The Commercial Court in Metamelpalaiyam allowed the plaintiff's suit against the defendant for recovery of an MSME loan outstanding of Rs. 15,16,931.86 as of 10.09.2024, ordering the defendant to pay this amount plus Rs. 14,15,500 with 9% annual interest from the suit date until judgment and 6% thereafter, along with court fees of Rs. 45,528. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Judgement
Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam
-
24-Feb-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam
-
17-Feb-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam
-
20-Jan-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam
-
25-Nov-2025
Issue of Process
Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam
-
29-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 52/2025
The Commercial Court in Metamelpalaiyam allowed the plaintiff's suit against the defendant for recovery of an MSME loan outstanding of Rs. 15,16,931.86 as of 10.09.2024, ordering the defendant to pay this amount plus Rs. 14,15,500 with 9% annual interest from the suit date until judgment and 6% thereafter, along with court fees of Rs. 45,528. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts