CHINTHAMANI vs AKSHARA P — 27/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER21RULE11(2). Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 14th March 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNCB190001352026
e-Filing Number
16-02-2026
Filing Number
150/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
27/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
Sub Court, Mettupalayam
Judge
2-Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHINTHAMANI
Adv. HARIKRISHNAN M
Respondent(s)
-
1.AKSHARA P
-
2.HEMALATHA P
-
3.THE MANAGER M/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case 27/2026 Summary The Lok Adalat resolved a dispute between petitioner Chinthamani and respondents Akshara P, Hemalatha P, and United India Insurance Company through settlement. United India Insurance Company agreed to pay Rs. 23,35,512 as compensation to the petitioner, who accepted this in full settlement of her claim. The respondent insurer was directed to deposit the amount within 30 days to the Subordinate Court, with 7.5% annual interest applicable if payment is delayed, and the court shall disburse funds to the petitioner via NEFT/RTGS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 27/2026
Case 27/2026 Summary The Lok Adalat resolved a dispute between petitioner Chinthamani and respondents Akshara P, Hemalatha P, and United India Insurance Company through settlement. United India Insurance Company agreed to pay Rs. 23,35,512 as compensation to the petitioner, who accepted this in full settlement of her claim. The respondent insurer was directed to deposit the amount within 30 days to the Subordinate Court, with 7.5% annual interest applicable if payment is delayed, and the court shall disburse funds to the petitioner via NEFT/RTGS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts