CHINTHAMANI vs AKSHARA P — 27/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER21RULE11(2). Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 14th March 2026.

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNCB190001352026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

16-02-2026

Filing Number

150/2026

Filing Date

18-02-2026

Registration No

27/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

Sub Court, Mettupalayam

Judge

2-Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER21RULE11(2)

Petitioner(s)

CHINTHAMANI

Adv. HARIKRISHNAN M

Respondent(s)

AKSHARA P

HEMALATHA P

THE MANAGER M/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam

14-03-2026

Disposed

24-02-2026

Service Pending

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Copy of Order

Case 27/2026 Summary The Lok Adalat resolved a dispute between petitioner Chinthamani and respondents Akshara P, Hemalatha P, and United India Insurance Company through settlement. United India Insurance Company agreed to pay Rs. 23,35,512 as compensation to the petitioner, who accepted this in full settlement of her claim. The respondent insurer was directed to deposit the amount within 30 days to the Subordinate Court, with 7.5% annual interest applicable if payment is delayed, and the court shall disburse funds to the petitioner via NEFT/RTGS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 27/2026 Summary The Lok Adalat resolved a dispute between petitioner Chinthamani and respondents Akshara P, Hemalatha P, and United India Insurance Company through settlement. United India Insurance Company agreed to pay Rs. 23,35,512 as compensation to the petitioner, who accepted this in full settlement of her claim. The respondent insurer was directed to deposit the amount within 30 days to the Subordinate Court, with 7.5% annual interest applicable if payment is delayed, and the court shall disburse funds to the petitioner via NEFT/RTGS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Mettupalayam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case