S. Parimalam vs Rajeshwari Advocate - N.Satheesh and P. Senthamilan — 43/2020
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or7R1. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB190001292020
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
150/2020
Filing Date
03-06-2020
Registration No
43/2020
Registration Date
25-06-2020
Court
Sub Court, Mettupalayam
Judge
2-Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S. Parimalam
Adv. Sivappugaz.K.T
S.Thirumalai selvan
Adv. Sivappugaz.K.T
Respondent(s)
Rajeshwari Advocate - N.Satheesh and P. Senthamilan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 25-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 02-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 17-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: Original Suit No.43/2020 for partition of property and declaration of deeds as null and void was dismissed for default on September 18, 2024. The plaintiffs failed to appear for the final hearing despite notice, and their counsel reported no instruction from them. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Original Suit No.43/2020 for partition of property and declaration of deeds as null and void was dismissed for default on September 18, 2024. The plaintiffs failed to appear for the final hearing despite notice, and their counsel reported no instruction from them. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts