N. Gangadharan vs M. Mohankumar Advocate - Sindhuja.V — 39/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCB190000952019

Part Heard

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

Filing Number

121/2019

Filing Date

06-03-2019

Registration No

39/2019

Registration Date

06-03-2019

Court

Sub Court, Mettupalayam

Judge

2-Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7
Ia/4/2025 Classification : 5 of Limitation Act Section M. MohankumarN. Gangadharan
Ia/5/2025 Classification : Petition to Set-aside Exparte Order or Decree Section M. MohankumarN. Gangadharan

Petitioner(s)

N. Gangadharan

Adv. Sivakumar. R

Respondent(s)

M. Mohankumar Advocate - Sindhuja.V

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam

27-04-2026

Part Heard

15-04-2026

Part Heard

30-03-2026

Part Heard

16-03-2026

Part Heard

11-03-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

09-02-2021
Copy of Deposition
18-10-2022
Copy of Judgment
23-02-2026
Copy of Deposition

This document is a deposition record (witness testimony), not a court order with a final judgment. PW.2 (Viswanathan, age 66) testified on February 23, 2026, in civil case O.S.39/2019 at Mettupalayam court regarding a loan dispute involving ₹4 lakhs borrowed from plaintiff Gangadharan for defendant Mohan Kumar's daughter's wedding, with interest of ₹1.50 lakhs remaining unpaid for three years. The witness was cross-examined by the defendant's counsel, and the testimony was recorded and authenticated before the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a deposition record (witness testimony), not a court order with a final judgment. PW.2 (Viswanathan, age 66) testified on February 23, 2026, in civil case O.S.39/2019 at Mettupalayam court regarding a loan dispute involving ₹4 lakhs borrowed from plaintiff Gangadharan for defendant Mohan Kumar's daughter's wedding, with interest of ₹1.50 lakhs remaining unpaid for three years. The witness was cross-examined by the defendant's counsel, and the testimony was recorded and authenticated before the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Code of Civil Procedure All acts →

More from this court

Sub Court, Mettupalayam All courts →

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case