Raja Alaise B Rajan vs Velumani Advocate - Gopalakrishnan.V — 30/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166(1)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 14th March 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNCB190000872024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

10-01-2024

Filing Number

87/2024

Filing Date

06-02-2024

Registration No

30/2024

Registration Date

06-02-2024

Court

Sub Court, Mettupalayam

Judge

2-Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166(1)(a)

Petitioner(s)

Raja Alaise B Rajan

Adv. VIGNESH K.

Respondent(s)

Velumani Advocate - Gopalakrishnan.V

Vaishnavi Akshaya Engineering

Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Limited

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-02-2026

Enquiry

18-12-2025

Enquiry

06-11-2025

Enquiry

16-10-2025

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary: The Lok Adalat (Case 30/2024) between Raja Alaise B Rajan and ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company resulted in a settlement. The court awarded Rs. 275,000 to the petitioner from the vehicle insurer in full settlement of the claim, with the amount to be deposited with the Subordinate Judge within 30 days at 7.5% interest if delayed. Court fees paid by the petitioner were refunded, and each party bore their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Lok Adalat (Case 30/2024) between Raja Alaise B Rajan and ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company resulted in a settlement. The court awarded Rs. 275,000 to the petitioner from the vehicle insurer in full settlement of the claim, with the amount to be deposited with the Subordinate Judge within 30 days at 7.5% interest if delayed. Court fees paid by the petitioner were refunded, and each party bore their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Mettupalayam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case