P.Chandran vs Thulasiammal — 11/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCB190000512026

Filing Number

62/2026

Filing Date

23-Jan-2026

Registration No

11/2026

Registration Date

23-Jan-2026

Court

Sub Court, Mettupalayam

Judge

2-Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.Chandran

    Adv. S MUNUSAMY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Thulasiammal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of DecreeView PDF

    The Metamattapalam court granted the plaintiff's main prayer for specific performance of a property sale agreement while dismissing the alternative relief sought. The court ordered the defendant to receive Rs. 4,20,000 from the plaintiff within one month and register the property in the plaintiff's name, and directed the defendant to pay Rs. 17,120 as costs to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Mettupalayam

  9. 23-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 23-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Metamattapalam court granted the plaintiff's main prayer for specific performance of a property sale agreement while dismissing the alternative relief sought. The court ordered the defendant to receive Rs. 4,20,000 from the plaintiff within one month and register the property in the plaintiff's name, and directed the defendant to pay Rs. 17,120 as costs to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case